Housing Disparity in Toronto Wards

Representing issues with the power of data. A project made for GBDA303.

Graphic design
June 20, 2024
View live project

Description

An Infographic that represents focused established affordable housing sectors in the Greater Toronto Area. Showing how each ward tells a different story.

Reflection

The analysis of affordable rental housing distribution across Toronto wards reveals significant disparities in housing availability and socio-economic conditions. Wards like Toronto Centre (32 units), Fort York (23 units), High Park (18 units), and Weston (18 units) have a high number of affordable rental units. This high concentration suggests that these areas might have better access to affordable housing resources, which could be due to targeted housing policies or higher demand for such housing. On the other hand, wards such as Black Creek (1 unit), Don Valley West (1 unit), Lawrence (4 units), and Willowdale (1 unit) show significantly lower numbers of affordable rental units. This disparity indicates potential gaps in affordable housing availability and might reflect higher property values, less demand for affordable housing, or limited development of such units in these areas. When assessing the current number of active divisions being established we see the clear discrepancy between the number of people who are on the waiting list compared to actual number of divisions available. Size doesn’t seem to matter for this issue and most of these affordable housing units seem to reside lower Downtown, Toronto. 

While keeping in mind not to overdue the infographic with text, visual aid was added alongside each fact point and important statistics are clearly highlighted depending on their meaning. Bar charts and block charts were employed to represent the number of affordable housing divisions per ward and the area distribution within these wards. Bar charts enable easy comparison across stages, while block charts effectively illustrate proportional data, such as the number of affordable divisions which makeup of different wards. The colours were chosen were to be able to recognize and emphasize the important needs of each ward. Visuals are meant to clearly paint a picture of what the according scenario looks like.  

The insights from this research can guide policymakers in identifying wards that require increased support and intervention. For instance, wards with high affordable housing needs but low availability can be prioritized for new housing projects. Urban planners can use this data to develop balanced, inclusive communities by addressing the disparities in housing distribution and socio-economic conditions. Researchers can build on this data to further explore the root causes of housing disparities and their socio-economic impacts. Advocacy groups can use the findings to lobby for policy changes, highlight issues of inequality, and drive public awareness campaigns focused on housing justice and urban equity. Non-profit organizations and community group scan leverage these insights to tailor their support programs. For example, areas identified with high socio-economic support needs can benefit from targeted initiatives such as job training programs, financial literacy workshops, and affordable childcare services. This ensures that resources are allocated effectively to where they are most needed.

In conclusion, the analysis of affordable rental housing across Toronto wards, visualized through a block chart, reveals significant disparities in housing availability. These insights can inform policy decisions, guide urban planning, and support community organizations in their efforts to address housing inequality. By targeting areas with the greatest need, stakeholders can work towards a more balanced and equitable housing landscape in Toronto.

No items found.